9 . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair for the offender and the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts Nonetheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The an abundance of this power casts an obligation within the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

Additionally it is important to note that granting of seniority to a civil servant without the actual size of service pretty much violates the whole service framework to be a civil servant inducted in Grade seventeen by claiming these kinds of benefit without any experience be directly posted in any higher quality, which is neither the intention on the regulation nor on the equity. Read more

As being the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is attained, therefore the decision in the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) on the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

This ruling has conditions, and For the reason that petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based about the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances with the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 of your Constitution. Read more

13. The Supreme Court has held that the moment the act of misconduct is established and also the employee is found guilty after owing process of legislation, it is the prerogative in the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, away from the various penalties provided in legislation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed will not be proportionate with the seriousness with the act of misconduct is not really sufficient nevertheless the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion within a structured and lawful manner. Read more

For your foregoing reasons the moment suit is dismissed with no order concerning cost. Office to prepare decree in the above mentioned terms. Read more

All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in help in the Supreme Court, making certain the enforcement of its judgments. Because the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become reached, the decision from the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) from the Constitution. Read more

In federal or multi-jurisdictional law systems there may exist conflicts between the assorted reduced appellate courts. Sometimes these differences might not be resolved, and it may be necessary to distinguish how the regulation is applied in a single district, province, division or appellate department.

The DCFS social worker in charge in the boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her 6-thirty day period report to your court, the worker elaborated about the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to move him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.

Summaries offer an essential glimpse into the intricate landscape of Environment and Climate Laws in Pakistan. Delving into this realm unveils a mosaic of regulations and procedures geared toward safeguarding natural resources, mitigating environmental degradation, and combating climate change.

Federalism also performs a major role in determining the authority of case law inside of a particular court. Indeed, Each and every circuit has its own set of binding case law. Due to this fact, a judgment rendered during the Ninth Circuit will not be binding inside the Second Circuit but will have persuasive authority.

If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability during the matter, but could not be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making this type of ruling, the defendants took their request on the appellate court.

17 . Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have heard the discovered counsel with the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to your interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) of your Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession from the subjected premises to the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs for being decided with the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this aspect for interim custody of the subject premises If your petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, it is also a properly-recognized proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is topic on the procedure provided under the relevant rules read more instead of otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.